3 ms·
Isn't this a trivial example though? You require bucket size >= 10 say. Full on differential privacy is meant to address harder problems. For example, if you a
by omegalulw 5y ago
Isn't this a trivial example though? You require bucket size >= 10 say.
Full on differential privacy is meant to address harder problems. For example, if you assume that there was a minor bug and people were asked to take the mandatory yearly survey again in a week.
Now if you assume that the responses of people who responded before will stay the same when they re-respond, then by taking the difference between both results you can identify some specific people by looking at which bucket counts changed - this would be how the new guy who joined in that week voted.
Differential privacy techniques are meant to anonymise data in way that you can't even do this.
- musingsole 5y agoIt's trivial to fix in retrospect, nearly impossible to anticipate all similar corner cases ahead of time, and -- most importantly -- indicative of the type of logical bugs our systems of the world have that permit hacking from script-kiddies to state actors.
- saghm 5y agoIt may be nearly impossible to anticipate _all_ corner cases, but come on, GP was talking about there only being a sample size of 1; this is super easy to notice and then just not include in the results.