It does look a bit odd, but not that odd. (Caveat: I'm on mobile and lazy so I've not read the post, just looked at the linked graph.) The plot "points" are bl

It does look a bit odd, but not that odd. (Caveat: I'm on mobile and lazy so I've not read the post, just looked at the linked graph.) The plot "points" are blobs rather than actual points, so there's likely some grouping of data going on, e.g. 0-9 votes, 10-19 votes, etc, per blob. Then it just seems that low scores are more tightly correlated with low copying, and the correlation dissipates as the score increases. That doesn't seem too surprising, I guess?