3 ms·
Why so aggressive? Including signatures as a matter of policy on all public communiques from a government agency would be useful for validating legitimacy, as
by wswope 5y ago
Why so aggressive?
Including signatures as a matter of policy on all public communiques from a government agency would be useful for validating legitimacy, as anything deepfaked (i.e. without a signature) would immediately be called into question.
- BoorishBears 5y agoIf you start a comment with patronzing bullshit: "I’m not trying to @ you here, but… are you sure you really know? Don't be shocked when someone gets annoyed. - And the level of naievte in your reply... You think someone is going to deepfake a public communique, are you joking? Sure, deepfake a press conference that no one can corroborate and everyone's just going to ignore the fact no one else saw it? The only place you have even the slightest chance of solving the actual problem, convincing people to trust the fake communication is stuff that's off the record. It's stuff that wouldn't be digital signed.