3 ms·
It is, isn’t it. The article talks about “open source is communism” but not authoritarianism, real communism. Which made me daydream about if the various licens
by cromulent 5y ago
It is, isn’t it. The article talks about “open source is communism” but not authoritarianism, real communism. Which made me daydream about if the various licenses for FOSS required profit making companies to pay 100$ per year for all you can eat FOSS. And then it got distributed on some usage based basis. Would things be better? Not practical though.
- DarylZero 5y agoSeems practical enough to me, but our government/society wouldn't go for it.