> I think you missed the point, people under 40 are not very likely to be hospitalized so why should they get the boosters. I don't see the point written anywh

> I think you missed the point, people under 40 are not very likely to be hospitalized so why should they get the boosters. I don't see the point written anywhere so I suppose I did. In my opinion, people should get the vaccine as long as the harm of not having it is greater than the harm of having it. Adverse reactions are very uncommon and unvaccinated people are at heightened risk of hospitalisation (even under 40s) so the balance tips in favour of the vaccine. The booster seems like a good idea due to Omicron. > People should be free to choose booster shots, those who are worried can continue to get booster shots. I do agree that people should have a choice to take it or not. However just as I believe the right to free speech doesn't mean I'm obliged to listen, I believe the right to choose not to be vaccinated (or receive a booster) doesn't mean I'm obliged to be around you. That is, I think it's fine for participation to be refused to people based on their vaccination status (though I support say testing as an alternative).