4 ms·
It's certainly a topic with a lot of nuance, but in this particular case, there's no valid argument made and EIKE is known for deliberate misinformation. There
by lima 5y ago
It's certainly a topic with a lot of nuance, but in this particular case, there's no valid argument made and EIKE is known for deliberate misinformation. There is unanimous scientific consensus (a rare thing!) about climate change being real and anthropogenic. Anyone trying to argue this point in 2021 has no place in a factual debate.
- LargoLasskhyfv 5y agoYou know? I know the site by name, mostly by comments from some german sites I visit. Telepolis.de, mostly, but this controversy popped up elsewhere. I just spent about 30 minutes there, and skimmed the headlines, abstracts, and saw they published articles stating climate change is anthropogenic also. Though they stated explicitely that's not 'their' position. Furthermore, one big fart, or many smaller belches of volcanic activity can change/tilt/whatver all the interconnected systems in other ways. Then what? Anyone who argues this, has no place in a marketing-war of ersatz-beliefs. Personally I prefer riding around the Georgia Guidestones on Blucifer. Yeehaaw!
- lima 5y agoI cited sources: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29736480 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29736480
- LargoLasskhyfv 5y agoI opined.