3 ms·
What doesn't make a lot of sense is comparing vaccines that have been around for ages (tetanus, flu) to ones that were developed like yesterday (COVID, malaria)
by cik2e 5y ago
What doesn't make a lot of sense is comparing vaccines that have been around for ages (tetanus, flu) to ones that were developed like yesterday (COVID, malaria).
I have the COVID vaccine but that doesn't mean I am not concerned about potential long-term effects that we know nothing about. That, and the possibility of original antigenic sin [0] permanently screwing over our ability to mount an effective immune response to novel strains.
What justification is there for pushing a non-sterilizing vaccine, that doesn't prevent spread, on non-vulnerable populations?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_antigenic_sin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_antigenic_sin
- q1w2 5y agoEven if it's not sterilizing, it does reduce the spread. Lower viral loads means less virus transmission.
- basch 5y agoLet's say antigenic sin fears became a reality. Then the short term solution is mass production of a next gen regeneron regencov? Or a different enough vaccine that causes a response? What leads you to believe long-term effects are possible?