Thank you. I re-read with this in mind, but I can't really follow the examples since I don't know Scala nor any other functional language. Is it correct to say

Thank you. I re-read with this in mind, but I can't really follow the examples since I don't know Scala nor any other functional language. Is it correct to say that the paper is more about 'advanced' uses of signals (and only mentions observers in passing), and from section 3 on relies on the parallellisation features of the language and runtime to create an event-driven state machine? I'm still not sure how they use 'reactive programming' and 'inversion of control' in relation to each other - it seems that what they call 'reactive programming' is 'inversion of control', no?