3 ms·
> it was copied from Java's JDK1.0 (1995) java.util.Date, which also had this quirk
by SippinLean 5y ago
> it was copied from Java's JDK1.0 (1995) java.util.Date, which also had this quirk
- jauco 5y agoNo. It’s definitely older than that. https://mobile.twitter.com/hillelogram/status/1329228419628998665 https://mobile.twitter.com/hillelogram/status/13292284196289...
- Taywee 5y agoTwitter is such a bad platform for this. Code in images means it's completely inaccessible to the blind and very inaccessible to people with poor vision, and you can't copy and paste it into an editor for syntax highlighting or better examination.
- BrendanEich 5y agohttps://twitter.com/bahstgwamt/status/867609109276872704?s=20 https://twitter.com/bahstgwamt/status/867609109276872704?s=2...
- mikeryan 5y agoJust because the issue predated Java doesn’t preclude the fact that the initial JavaScript Date implementation was lifted from java.util.Date. Brandon Eich has explicitly stated it was so. https://maggiepint.com/2017/04/09/fixing-javascript-date-getting-started/ https://maggiepint.com/2017/04/09/fixing-javascript-date-get...