3 ms·
I'm pretty addicted to git's lightweight branching now. Mercurial looks appealing in some ways but, from what I understand, it doesn't support anything similar,
by cageface 15y ago
I'm pretty addicted to git's lightweight branching now. Mercurial looks appealing in some ways but, from what I understand, it doesn't support anything similar, at least not in the core.
- AlexMax 15y agoYou are thinking of Bookmarks, which have been a part of core since 1.8 and was an extension included with mercurial for a few versions prior.
- eru 15y agoBookmarks mimic git's branches to some extent, but last time I tried they did not cope well with complicated merges.
- Ixiaus 15y agoFor heavier work, hg's patch queue's are unmatched. (not to mention you can version the patch queue as well!) If bookmarks are too lightweight for something (say you have an experimental branch that you want to branch on-top of) patch queues are amazing. Not to mention their ease of use!! http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/managing-change-with-mercurial-queues.html http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/managing-change-with-mercuri...