4 ms·
Great article! I think you’ve done a great job of introducing these difficult concepts in simple language. I saved to Pocket and it’s already got a Best Of labe
by Jun8 5y ago
Great article! I think you’ve done a great job of introducing these difficult concepts in simple language. I saved to Pocket and it’s already got a Best Of label there.
PCA (KLT) can be introduced as a generalization of the Fourier Transform. This can follow from using a cocktail mix analogy to Fourier Series. When I was a TA this was the approach I took with students, which seemed to make things easier for them.
An introductory post on PCA vs FA is here: https://towardsdatascience.com/what-is-the-difference-between-pca-and-factor-analysis-5362ef6fa6f9 https://towardsdatascience.com/what-is-the-difference-betwee...
Personal note: Susan Dumais, mentioned in the article also did great early work in text summarization, just after she joined Microsoft. I tried using some of her approached in video summarization in my PHDin early 2000s. How time flies.
- ReaLNero 5y agoPCA applies an orthogonal linear transformation, while FA uses a series of coefficients to scale a sequence of functions, which are then integrated. They are similar in use but very different in method. Calling one a generalization of the other seems misguided?
- aaaaaaaaaaab 5y agoUmmm… the Fourier Transform is an orthonormal linear transformation.
- canjobear 5y agoI don’t think explaining it as a generalization of the Fourier transform is going to help very much with New Yorker readers.