5 ms·
It has no impact thanks to the inverse square law. This is a much stronger field, very close to the brain, done in a targeted way.
by driverdan 5y ago
It has no impact thanks to the inverse square law. This is a much stronger field, very close to the brain, done in a targeted way.
- eru 5y agoTo provide an analogy: wifi has more or less the same kind of radiation as a microwave oven. But wifi is much weaker and not inside a faraday cage. So it doesn't cook you.
- giantg2 5y agoOk, so we know that lower exposure doesn't cause the acute effects. What I'm asking about is chronic lower exposure. To continue your analogy, there is inconclusive data showing that RF exposure could reduce sperm count or be a risk factor for certain cancers.
- giantg2 5y agoDo you have some data on that? How about for people on a degaussed ship? I understand the inverse square and that this is a very strong field. I was wondering about chronic exposure to weaker fields.