If we question the motive or even the eventual consequence of an article but not the truth, that’s NOT fact-checking anymore but purely intention-checking, whos

If we question the motive or even the eventual consequence of an article but not the truth, that’s NOT fact-checking anymore but purely intention-checking, whose intention and what the hell it might be. At least at that point, “fact-checking” is becoming a propaganda machine, no more, no less. Communist countries have even “security law” to put people in jail based purely on intention and eventual consequences. Btw, the “fact-checker” labeled the article as “false information”, not as “misleading”.