> That's a pretty narrow ban. Sure but it's still a world away from "This author is suggesting that because HER book, in particular, wasn't chosen by this part

> That's a pretty narrow ban. Sure but it's still a world away from "This author is suggesting that because HER book, in particular, wasn't chosen by this particular school, that she is somehow aggrieved" which was your original claim. > Meaning it's still available from the library, but parents have to give consent Yes, like I said, "restricted". But again miles from "wasn't chosen". > It is not completely unreasonable to put guards around the material we expose our kids to Indeed not and if this particular book were being argued about in good faith, I'd have zero problem with it being taken out of schools. Choosing particularly salacious out of context quotes and mischaracterising it is 100% not "good faith" though.