3 ms·
How about making different specs for different features instead of lumping everything under "HDMI 2.1a" It smells like another episode of USB C 3.2 and their h
by netizen-936824 5y ago
How about making different specs for different features instead of lumping everything under "HDMI 2.1a"
It smells like another episode of USB C 3.2 and their handling of video capabilities
Re: a shitshow
- xg15 5y agoIt's still a single cable, so all the features will necessarily be interconnected with each other. Of course you could make an "extension standard" instead of a whole new version, but I don't see how that would make any difference except in formalities.