4 ms·
Article is dated 2010. Reading this part was amusing to me, for some people it might make their heads explode (figuratively): "With this in mind, smoking shoul
by PopAlongKid 5y ago
Article is dated 2010.
Reading this part was amusing to me, for some people it might make their heads explode (figuratively): "With this in mind, smoking should be commenced at as young an age as is reasonably possible. Children who have not yet developed a pincer grasp might require modified cigarette holders, safety lighters or both."
My own experience is mixed. In high school, I was a cross-country runner (3 mile footrace). I was almost always just one or two positions behind the top five runners on my team (only top five score points in a meet). Many years later, I started to think that maybe my daily exposure (one or two hours) to second-hand cigarette smoke from one of my parents had something to do with me not being faster. This study seems to indicate that might not be true at all. And our fastest runner on the team (competitive at the state level) was known to be an occasional cigarette smoker. Go figure.
- hazza_n_dazza 5y agoyou can see that this is a 'joke' article, used to show how 'facts' can lead to bad conclusions..
- s1artibartfast 5y agoMore importantly, it shows the noise in correlations. Life is stochastic and multivariate, not binary. I played a competitive aerobic sport and the French national team performed well, but would smoke. There are smokers that live 100+ years. That doesn't mean smoking is safe or good.
- PopAlongKid 5y agoI actually looked to see if it was published on April 1 or something. If it is a joke, it is pretty elaborate to say the least.