Well that's not Snopes. But, assuming we're taking these as identical claims (and they are not necessarily), I still don't think that necessarily reflects bias

Well that's not Snopes. But, assuming we're taking these as identical claims (and they are not necessarily), I still don't think that necessarily reflects bias in any case. These were two separate fact checks about two claims worded slightly differently, spaced 3 years apart. They were performed by two different organizations, and also likely performed by different people. That they landed only a degree apart (mostly true vs half true) seems pretty consistent. Certainly doesn't seem like any kind of egregious bias.