Then it's clear why texas might not stock a book right? I let my kids look at Nat Geo Kids. I don't have them looking at hustler. This is parenting 101 stuff.

Then it's clear why texas might not stock a book right? I let my kids look at Nat Geo Kids. I don't have them looking at hustler. This is parenting 101 stuff. Every study shows that letting kids be kids is a good thing for their development. Yes, some kids (often without good parental involvement) get exposed to "adult" topics much earlier. This is correlated with plenty of miserable and sad outcomes. Let me ask you this. Why should you, who is not a parent of the kids in this school, have a right to force violent imagery on those kids? Or force the procurement and availability of this material? Or of any material? Answer that question - and you will answer your own question. Some reviews here: http://commonsensemedia.org/book-reviews/out-of-darkness/user-reviews/adult http://commonsensemedia.org/book-reviews/out-of-darkness/use... Example: This novel crosses some legal boundaries with the adult/child abuse and rape scenes. It is VERY detail, vivid, and graphic. It includes descriptive scenes of the main character being sexually abuse by her father. Years later, her pastor encourages her to marry her stepfather as a child. This book continues to get worse as it include graphic images of children violently harmed. Eventually, a bomb goes off at school and her little sister is killed- graphic descriptions of her body parts are all over. This novel is a canvas, showcasing child abuse. There isn't any healthy themes or solutions. The poster demands your child be exposed to this - no regard to age or your own parental views.