2 ms·
Right, I get that point, I'm simply asking why musl introduced this change in 1.2.0 - why wasn't this 2.0.0? The fact that the 1.1.0 and 1.2.0 types are incompa
by DSMan195276 5y ago
Right, I get that point, I'm simply asking why musl introduced this change in 1.2.0 - why wasn't this 2.0.0? The fact that the 1.1.0 and 1.2.0 types are incompatible in a significant way seems counter-intuitive to me, and even after looking into it I don't see much in the way of describing how you're supposed to handle musl upgrades. Is the expectation that you recompile everything for every new feature release of musl? I couldn't find that spelled out anywhere but it seems like that is the case, or else stuff will be broken via changes like this one.