5 ms·
I must have not done a good job explaining. Of course depression is a biological condition (because the mind emerges from the brain). That doesn't mean it's a s
by el_nahual 5y ago
I must have not done a good job explaining. Of course depression is a biological condition (because the mind emerges from the brain). That doesn't mean it's a single condition with a single cause or even a group of pathological causes, the way cancer is, or MLS.
But yes, of course it's biological. What an intellectually honest psychiatrist would say is something like "look, you're not doing well. Here are some things we can try to shift the playing field a bit. We don't know exactly how they work or why, but we know they do work, somewhat. Want to try? Here's the side effects: "
That would be intellectually honest. Saying "you have A (single, diagnosed) disease, caused by "a chemical imbalance", and the root cause of that disease is treated by this medicine" is dishonest.
- maratc 5y agoOk, but if "depression is a biological condition" — I understand we don't know the details — would you agree with what is said in TLA, that "[t]here is no depression Gremlin, either"? The biological condition — that we can't test for yet — seems for me to be exactly that "depression Gremlin".