I found the discussion around ambiguity and required group consolidation around a shared understanding pretty interesting. One could imagine that the amount of

I found the discussion around ambiguity and required group consolidation around a shared understanding pretty interesting. One could imagine that the amount of ambiguity present in a problem could then set the scale of how many people should be working on something: with large ambiguity it becomes hard for a big group to consolidate on a shared understanding, and they might never then align their efforts. Presumably a leader of a large group should set very few and clear goals to align the group around. The tension then I would guess is that this might not best make use of the specific skills of the individuals present.