3 ms·
No surprise but I guess it didn't work, the article is from 2016 and the website no longer exists...
by sschueller 5y ago
No surprise but I guess it didn't work, the article is from 2016 and the website no longer exists...
- thaumasiotes 5y agoThe article is from 2016? It looks like it's from 2013 to me, though admittedly updated in 2015. I found some surprisingly open-minded English-language coverage, also from 2013: https://e-catworld.com/2013/09/28/brazilian-company-building-claimed-gravity-engine/ https://e-catworld.com/2013/09/28/brazilian-company-building... https://will.illinois.edu/news/story/new-gravity-driven-generator-promised-for-gilman-soy-processor https://will.illinois.edu/news/story/new-gravity-driven-gene... > One blogger with a Brazilian radio station dismisses the project as an impossible perpetual motion machine. Even if it’s not quite that, University of Illinois Electrical Engineering Professor Peter Sauer said he’s never seen a gravity-driven device work without some additional energy input. Didn't see any coverage after 2013. I wonder what the idea was. You can't announce a perpetual motion machine without being aware that there's no such thing.