I actually support nuclear, oddly enough. And I'm not arguing anything out of hand. I would posit that the only rational position to take, when the situation ha

I actually support nuclear, oddly enough. And I'm not arguing anything out of hand. I would posit that the only rational position to take, when the situation has relentlessly worsened over generations, is to be suspicious of large scale environmental interference. It genuinely requires religious faith to believe that geo-engineering would be successful without significant consequences. You position myself and others taking my position as religious zealots, but tell me: why is it so upsetting to you that i might question technology's ability to save us? And why would it upset you so much, that i might not consider humanity in its current state, to be worth saving if it meant risking the global ecosystem? Humanism is a sick cult, and technologism even more so. Both will destroy us and the planet we live on.