4 ms·
The backup & restore is a strawman argument. I'm not arguing the data is gone. And why would anyone be afraid of google killing your project.. You just made th
by ArbVision 5y ago
The backup & restore is a strawman argument. I'm not arguing the data is gone.
And why would anyone be afraid of google killing your project.. You just made the point and linked OpenSea deslisting projects... How about referring you back the same link you sent me?
List of reasons:
"infringe on protected intellectual property,
promote suicide or self-harm,
incite hate or violence against others,
degrade or dox another individual,
otherwise violate our terms of service."
- NicoJuicy 5y agoYou're entire thread concluded with: NFT's are owned by the people. My point was that it doesn't matter, since people will use companies and companies have to enforce rules.
- ArbVision 5y agoYou're misinterpreting the main point I'm making. It's not that I don't want Google vs blockchain cause I'm afraid of delistings or something. My main thought experiment is with an artist who is established and wouldn't get delisted. It's about the fact that humans have come together to decide this is what digital ownership means - it's on a distributed database and not by a company. Maybe there is a world in which Google was the oracle of NFTs, but in our world, society has agreed on blockchain.
- NicoJuicy 5y agoI am sure that society in our world would call you delusional if you used that argument in front of a judge for copyright infringement of a Mickey Mouse NFT for example. I already discussed that recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29715994 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29715994