3 ms·
> if cutting out Colorado is less painful to profits than disclosing salaries So you implied that disclosing salaries cuts into profits, which I took to mean t
by aerosmile 5y ago
> if cutting out Colorado is less painful to profits than disclosing salaries
So you implied that disclosing salaries cuts into profits, which I took to mean that you're seeing an inverse first-order relationship between salaries and profits.
- DarylZero 5y agoJust quoting the whole sentence shows that that's not what they meant: > "Reducing surface area for conflict" is one of many steps on the way to the goal for profit, and if cutting out Colorado is less painful to profits than disclosing salaries and opening up that conflict surface, then that's naturally what will happen.
- eganist 5y agoThank you