The point is that you're arguing the metaphor rather than the point of the metaphor. Your additions are bullshit. They add nothing but to somehow point at the

The point is that you're arguing the metaphor rather than the point of the metaphor. Your additions are bullshit. They add nothing but to somehow point at the poster and go "ah-ha". Because you're really just making the same point as the poster: Important details that change the story can be left out. It doesn't matter which party in the hypothetical scenario is actually correct, only that one of them is not because they left out significant details.