Thank you for validating the theory that many appear to have lost the plot and are primarily motivated by destroying oil and gas rather than solving climate cha

Thank you for validating the theory that many appear to have lost the plot and are primarily motivated by destroying oil and gas rather than solving climate change. I don't think it's an intentional conclusion many reach, just that they've subconsciously mixed up the purpose of what they're advocating to solve. Also does anybody responding understand what a hypothetical proposition is? Why are you all responding about the technical merits of carbon capture, which has nothing to do with my comment.