it would be difficult to be impressed by this structure if you have passing familiarity with what contemporary civilizations were building. it’s obviously of hi

it would be difficult to be impressed by this structure if you have passing familiarity with what contemporary civilizations were building. it’s obviously of historical and archaeological significance but my assumption based on the superlatives in the article was that it had been built 1-2k years before its actual construction, roughly contemporaneous with eg notre dame and roughly aligning with the social & technological sophistication of contemporary stone age peoples in the americas. it’s interesting but the text of the article does seem patronizing.