I don’t understand how the exact nuances of their order regarding my selected example are of interest to you in this discussion, or how those nuances contribute

I don’t understand how the exact nuances of their order regarding my selected example are of interest to you in this discussion, or how those nuances contribute to it. You’ve pointed out what you believe to be a fact, one somewhat contradicted by their plain language wording here [1], but haven’t yet explained why you’re presenting that to us at all. Please do explain. [1] https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/5053.pdf https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/5053.pdf