He didn't say anything meaningful. He showed no humility or thoughtfulness in the policies of his company. The fact is his company is helping shape the policy o

He didn't say anything meaningful. He showed no humility or thoughtfulness in the policies of his company. The fact is his company is helping shape the policy of nation-states across the world. And it's obvious from his responses he has no interest besides checking the boxes the regulators give him and turning a profit within the bounds of the law. He doesn't even take the threat of corruption seriously or undue influence seriously. > if you want that fixed elect people who will get it done Unless his company donates to politicians that oppose any kind of regulations that could hurt their business. But don't worry, their super PAC ads are heavily regulated and will state the party paying for it ;-) There is a symbiotic relationship between large corporations and their regulators that should be examined. And it's especially pervasive when it comes to public health. I didn't expect him to do an interview, and I would have been fine if he didn't but please don't piss on me and tell me it's raining.