3 ms·
Seems fine to me. Rust has a "foreach" which is named for, working ok. Of course Rust has ranges as iterators, so it's not necessarily noticed that "there is no
by kzrdude 5y ago
Seems fine to me. Rust has a "foreach" which is named for, working ok. Of course Rust has ranges as iterators, so it's not necessarily noticed that "there is no numerical for" but it works.
- masklinn 5y ago> Rust has a "foreach" which is named for, working ok. Also ruby / python. Don't see the point of a C-style for loop in a modern language, reusing the keyword is perfectly sensible (even more so as many which have both use the same keyword). C# actively weirds me out every time from having both for and foreach, complete waste of brainspace.