I think the problem here is that your argument defines millions of people and then their loved ones as “a problem” that just… has no answer except that they’re

I think the problem here is that your argument defines millions of people and then their loved ones as “a problem” that just… has no answer except that they’re too inconvenient to consider that maybe their concerns aren’t overblown?? I’m not advocating for broad sweeping stuff here (why are you ranting at me about this??) or literally any action except “hey maybe some people are advocating reasonably according to their circumstances here”. I think again you’re still imposing your view on others including myself. If you read what I’m literally saying, at no point did I advocate that society should drastically change to adjust for immunocompromised people. I am merely pointing out that assuming there are no reasonable advocates is very likely a sign of personal bias .