2 ms·
No, it is not. The opposite would be that it requires financial resources of the class you want to be part of to be part of a class. Which wasn't what I (or th
by ethbr0 5y ago
No, it is not. The opposite would be that it requires financial resources of the class you want to be part of to be part of a class.
Which wasn't what I (or the report) said: the idea is that it takes some level of financial resources as a prerequisite for a chance at top-level success.
- joshuamorton 5y agoYes yes, class mobility but only for the already wealthy. Tell me more.
- ethbr0 5y agoWhich part of the report do you see as equating "financial resources" (my words) with "wealthy" (your words)?