2 ms·
Thank you. I do agree that peer review must be done, but it's almost too simple. None of the parts of my proposed prototype are very interesting or controversi
by pontifier 5y ago
Thank you. I do agree that peer review must be done, but it's almost too simple.
None of the parts of my proposed prototype are very interesting or controversial. I'm not using extreme magnetic fields, or exotic materials or new physics. Nothing about the device requires more than highschool physics and geometry to understand.
With a new arrangement, this novel solution to contain and collide ions falls out.
It's a gedanken that just needs to be built because the basic idea is less involved than some homework I've had.
Here's the main idea in the style of a highschool homework assignment:
Draw a point on a piece of paper. How many unique circles you can draw that pass through that point?
Each of those circles represents the cyclotron trajectory of a single deuterium ion in my device.
There's basically nothing to write about until an experiment is built.
I need some "marketing neutrons" as Michel Laberge of General Fusion put it (https://youtu.be/2m9kC1yRnLQ?t=639 https://youtu.be/2m9kC1yRnLQ?t=639).