> Who said anything about "societal norms"? The parent comment, by context, was inferring from societal norms. You yourself now say you pointed out how there i

> Who said anything about "societal norms"? The parent comment, by context, was inferring from societal norms. You yourself now say you pointed out how there is "no justification was even given for a claim." That means you are ignoring the parent comments context, which is societal norms. The justification is implied to be societally defined normal behavior. You can ask anyone why they shouldn't steal - it would be related to societal norms / morals. But then your answer, by analogy, would be to discard those arguments. > I didn't make any logical response to the non-argument (which wouldn't make sense to even try), instead I made a meta-response ABOUT the fact of non-argument. The assertion that it was a non-argument is based on the rejection of its context.