4 ms·
> that its a tiny tiny fraction of a basis point of activity on the network Hence why it's not in the news...I still don't understand your point?
by mbesto 5y ago
> that its a tiny tiny fraction of a basis point of activity on the network
Hence why it's not in the news...I still don't understand your point?
- vmception 5y agoBecause thats the standard that should apply to bitcoin and crypto But instead no proportions are mentioned in a crypto fraud, just large dollar values paraded as if its unique It is intended to distort perception and its silly
- mbesto 5y agoHow much USD$ or equivalent is moved into cryptocoins and how much of that amount is considered fraudulent? Until you have numbers there, then I simply don't believe your premise.
- vmception 5y agoAll I want you to do is acknowledge that the same is true about the opposite premise. They don't have a way to quantify the premise that a higher, or overwhelming, or any specific percentage is fraudulent either. The earlier information you were exposed to is simply being assigned a higher weight arbitrarily.