4 ms·

> no, because free markets are an illusion (information asymetry). That's not relevant. > also the ppl payed to stay at home are mostly not working-class. Ci

by HKH2 5y ago

> no, because free markets are an illusion (information asymetry). That's not relevant. > also the ppl payed to stay at home are mostly not working-class. Citation?

hansel_der 5y ago
> That's not relevant. it serves to disprove your misleading implication that free markets were destroyed by the goverment paying ppl to stay at home. > Citation? look around