3 ms·
no, because free markets are an illusion (information asymetry). also the ppl payed to stay at home are mostly not working-class.
by hansel_der 5y ago
no, because free markets are an illusion (information asymetry).
also the ppl payed to stay at home are mostly not working-class.
- HKH2 5y ago> no, because free markets are an illusion (information asymetry). That's not relevant. > also the ppl payed to stay at home are mostly not working-class. Citation?
- hansel_der 5y ago> That's not relevant. it serves to disprove your misleading implication that free markets were destroyed by the goverment paying ppl to stay at home. > Citation? look around