> I use Doom Emacs which is a lot better than Spacemacs in my opinion. Can you explain why? I use Spacemacs (and like it) but have always been curious about Do

> I use Doom Emacs which is a lot better than Spacemacs in my opinion. Can you explain why? I use Spacemacs (and like it) but have always been curious about Doom Emacs. > This time I was motivated by emacs excelent support for LSP which I wanted for Go. Neovim has built in support for LSP. I'm guessing Neovim's support for LSP is also very good by now. You have been using the original Vim? > Nowhere near as fast as vim but the added features are worth the perfomance hit. Are you comparing Vim with emacs-27 or earlier? Or are you comparing Vim with the unreleased (but still very usable) Emacs 28? Emacs 28 is a bit more zippy due to the native elisp compiler. I think you will be pleased with the performance boost!