3 ms·
There is also another paper comparing the power of Chatterjee coefficient with other traditional ones. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11619 https://arxiv.org/abs/2
by neeleshs 5y ago
There is also another paper comparing the power of Chatterjee coefficient with other traditional ones.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11619 https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11619
- abeppu 5y agoIt is interesting to note that the Chatterjee paper makes a point of mentioning Pearson, Spearman, Kendall's tau, whereas the ones focused on in this paper all appear as citations but aren't explicitly discussed.
- nestorD 5y agoTo be fair, Pearson, Spearman and Kendall's tau are the coeffisicent people use in practice. Had I been in the author's position I would have done the same: cite all the interesting developements but compare with what people actually use. Comparing with something people barely know should be nice but people have a limited attention span so I would push to that anexes at best and focus on the more important parts.
- johnfhan 5y agoFor Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall's tau: (i) neither one of them could detect complex (nonlinear/non-monotone) dependence; (ii) they are clearly very powerful in detecting linear/monotone dependence. All these results have been documented in textbooks and repeatedly talked in classes for over 50 years.