You provided zero evidence, argument, or any support whatsoever for claims (1), (2), or (3). I think all of these claims are somewhere between mostly false and

You provided zero evidence, argument, or any support whatsoever for claims (1), (2), or (3). I think all of these claims are somewhere between mostly false and abjectly absurd. But this general topic has been discussed at length elsewhere (if you want to know about it, you can go do your own research), and is entirely off topic in a conversation about the OSS or industrial sabotage. It is a waste of time to make up pretend “stronger” (more realistically, just as weak but not quite as overtly bigoted) claims to replace a wild bigoted conspiracy theory with a slightly less wild, slightly less bigoted conspiracy theory in a public conversation, so as to have a debate vs. myself only loosely related to the original off topic nonsense. It isn’t going to convince the conspiracy theorist (who will say that replacing his claims with invented substitutes is disingenuous), and no one else reading along cares. P.S. when you tell your interlocutor that they are “confabulating” and “hallucinating” (i.e. accuse them of mental illness), it is hard to see your comments as representing good faith conversation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confabulation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confabulation