3 ms·
Cool, but this: "Much to my surprise, my Java implementation performed nearly as well as the c++ version!" Made me sigh. How long will it take to convince peop
by davedx 15y ago
Cool, but this: "Much to my surprise, my Java implementation performed nearly as well as the c++ version!"
Made me sigh. How long will it take to convince people that the JVM really is actually pretty fast these days [1] and comparable with native code for the majority of tasks?
[1] http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/which-programming-languages-are-fastest.php?calc=chart&gcc=on&javasteady=on&java=on&clojure=on http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/which-programming-lan...
- hcal 15y agoI read that line as a indication that Java wasn't his go-to language and he just wasn't as comfortable with Java. Sort of a "wow I did better than I thought." I would imagine anyone capable of building three versions of a unique renderer would know that java can be pretty fast. Just playing devils advocate.
- wladimir 15y agoIt has been pretty fast for a long time. Most complaints I hear about it concern start-up time, or memory usage. Which is mostly the case because a lot of the "enterprise" java stuff is incredibly bloated, not because of the language/VM itself.