3 ms·
Here's the thing: I really like Loqseq's interface (it mimic's Andy Matuschak's Evergreen notes[0]) but I really hate the fact that it doesn't let me edit plain
by codethief 5y ago
Here's the thing: I really like Loqseq's interface (it mimic's Andy Matuschak's Evergreen notes[0]) but I really hate the fact that it doesn't let me edit plain Markdown files and write free-form text. (Looks like I'm not the only one[1].) It forces me into this weird outliner format that I personally don't like at all – and I'm saying this as someone who used org-mode for years.
[0]: https://notes.andymatuschak.org/Evergreen_notes https://notes.andymatuschak.org/Evergreen_notes
[1]: https://discuss.logseq.com/t/allow-non-outline-freeform-text/172 https://discuss.logseq.com/t/allow-non-outline-freeform-text... , https://discuss.logseq.com/t/how-about-separately-supporting-outliner-md-format-and-native-md-om-format/928 https://discuss.logseq.com/t/how-about-separately-supporting...
- agambrahma 5y agoHmm, OTOH the _only_ reason I like LogSeq is because of the outliner format. I think there are a lot of different styles out there which manifest in how different people end up using these tools. I ended up moving from Obsidian to Logseq basically just to get "native outline format", and LogSeq is in that sense an "offline, open-format version of Roam".