2 ms·
> What you are essentially asking is for the 50W port to support 65W, That 50W port already supports up to 100W when it's the only port occupied, so from my un
by Dunedan 5y ago
> What you are essentially asking is for the 50W port to support 65W,
That 50W port already supports up to 100W when it's the only port occupied, so from my understanding the hardware is already capable of it.
> or every single port to support 120W if it needs to be.
That'd be perfect of course, but yes, that would significantly increase the BOM.
- ksec 5y ago>That 50W port already supports up to 100W when it's the only port occupied, so from my understanding the hardware is already capable of it. You can think of these charger as two charger combined into one. It has one side with two port of combined 120W Max and the other side with 20+20W max. So you cant allocate the low power port over to high power port. The 20+20 are there as baseline. What you want is dynamic allocation of 120W between 4 port in an ultra intelligent manner, again a cost issue, UX issue and policy issue as mentioned by gummy's reply.