Different styles to decision making is the way to go. I tend to be more authoritarian within my own teams and consensual when trying to get outcome across teams

Different styles to decision making is the way to go. I tend to be more authoritarian within my own teams and consensual when trying to get outcome across teams where I don't have direct control over heads. Generally speaking it's all about trying to get sh*t done and I get frustrated easily when people spend a lot of time in analysis paralysis without realsing it. Death by zoom. This has recently led me to consider adopting a more algorithmic approach to decision making within my teams based in the impact of each decision. Basically the question I am asking myself is can I automate lower impact / high frequency decisions making more time to spend on higher impact / low frequency decisions. For this interested in this the idea came from this paper: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://leeds-faculty.colorado.edu/jere1232/Camuffo%2520Gambardella%2520and%2520Pignataro.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjYlt-T5f_0AhULO8AKHZAyClIQFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3ajY4g0xV9YK38DvrcWJRE https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/...