3 ms·
So people would only go to a stand if there's nobody being served, because being behind the person currently being served is discouraged. Essentially, you'd jus
by luckylion 5y ago
So people would only go to a stand if there's nobody being served, because being behind the person currently being served is discouraged. Essentially, you'd just move the queue: people would wait for a "spot" to open up (a stand with no customer) and then go there.
If it's orderly, they kind of queue in the middle. If it's not, you'll have a large brawl as people try to get in front of each other.
- londons_explore 5y agoI think you misunderstood the proposed queueing system.... The stand will never be 'open'. People who arrive join the front of the queue, and are either served next, or someone else joins in front of them, pushing them back. When they're position 2 in the queue, they will only be served if 2 people are served and 0 arrive (low probably). If another person arrives, they're now position 3 in the queue, so 3 need to be served before any arrivals (even lower probably). At some point, they decide the probability of being served drops low enough that they give up and leave - this will usually happen quickly. The only way to 'game' this system is to look up the street and join the queue when it looks like nobody else is coming. If many people try to do this, then those people will be waiting forever (both want to join last - stalemate), and anyone who doesn't employ the tactic gets served.
- becuzThrowaway 5y agoIn practice, you would just replace the queue with a disorganized rabble of people standing around, where as soon as the person currently being served leaves, there is a mad dash at the one secure spot, which is at the very front.