3 ms·
Look at https://github.com/microsoft/cups/commit/8100595a3a3a6d5c7d0ced7598807bad5c6d4d6c https://github.com/microsoft/cups/commit/8100595a3a3a6d5c7d0... . This
by ognarb 5y ago
Look at https://github.com/microsoft/cups/commit/8100595a3a3a6d5c7d0ced7598807bad5c6d4d6c https://github.com/microsoft/cups/commit/8100595a3a3a6d5c7d0... . This was done by an human.
- btdmaster 5y agoAre they deliberately getting their modifications under an pseudo-incompatible* license? This is the only reasonable explanation I can think of. * IANAL. Although Apache 2.0 and MIT are compatible, using a different license makes it awkward for changes to be merged upstream.
- ognarb 5y agoThe biggest change between Apache 2.0 and MIT are related to patents. INAL but the Apache 2.0 is a lot more safe in this aspect.
- mst 5y agoAs noted elsewhere in this thread this one looks like human misunderstanding and has already been raised internally for fixage. Shame it slipped through the cracks, but at scale eventually something's going to no matter how hard you try.