They're using the same argument the copyright industry use against pirates. Instead of this person saying they saved 150 lives, the copyright industry say the

They're using the same argument the copyright industry use against pirates. Instead of this person saying they saved 150 lives, the copyright industry say the artists lost X amount making the assumption each pirate, given no other option, would pay for the copy the pirated. I often am curious how many of those pirates would have actually paid.