> Unless copilot serves as a legally effective "laundering" of gpl code. It's quite interesting how it seems to have come full circle, at least according to th

> Unless copilot serves as a legally effective "laundering" of gpl code. It's quite interesting how it seems to have come full circle, at least according to this stackoverflow comment about Stallman releasing a paper in 1992 on how to effectively launder AT&T code via textual changes (I have no idea if he did, I just remembered the comment): https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/591221 https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/591221