2 ms·

I am well informed, but you seem to be ignorrant of the fact that most countries don't need US' racke..., oops, I mean protection. Should we ask people of Syri

I am well informed, but you seem to be ignorrant of the fact that most countries don't need US' racke..., oops, I mean protection. Should we ask people of Syria what is the US doing on their soil? Or Iraqis, who want them out but they for some reason don't wanna leave. As for loans...well, maybe don't take them if you can't repay them. The West is lending too, you know. And those credits aren't cheap.

NicoJuicy 5y ago
Mispositioning words don't mean anything. And the loans are done by WHO. Many people benefit from it, but you can't get them while doing stupid things. At least it is manageable to pay back. While China had some well positioned corrupt loans going on, which they actually want infrastructure/premium ressources and self managed in return. WHO doesn't have those conflicting interests. I'm not saying WHO is perfect either, but it's obviously superior to the other option.
- wheelerof4te 5y ago
  WHO is giving loans? Oooh, you meant vaccines. I thought we were talking about financial loans. By the way, I come from a country that was bombed by the US (doesn't narrow it much, I know) and can you guess what the new puppet government did after the war ended? Yeah, it sold nearly all domestic companies, mines and factories for pennies to the western capitalists. It also dismantled a very efficient domestic financial/accounting system, replacing it with foreign banks. So, don't talk to me about how the West is somehow different, or better than China.
  - NicoJuicy 5y ago
    Yet, you can still talk about it on an open forum on "a western platform" ( note: this isn't to take a side on good/wrong since i don't know what exactly you are talking about) But I'm pretty sure the problems in the country predate US intervention. And it doesn't contradict the fact that capitalism has made the world more peaceful than ever because of trade. Convince me with numbers otherwise. Ps. Yeah, i said WHO instead of IMF. Obviously, it's the latter.

NicoJuicy 5y ago

Mispositioning words don't mean anything. And the loans are done by WHO. Many people benefit from it, but you can't get them while doing stupid things. At least it is manageable to pay back. While China had some well positioned corrupt loans going on, which they actually want infrastructure/premium ressources and self managed in return. WHO doesn't have those conflicting interests. I'm not saying WHO is perfect either, but it's obviously superior to the other option.

wheelerof4te 5y ago
WHO is giving loans? Oooh, you meant vaccines. I thought we were talking about financial loans. By the way, I come from a country that was bombed by the US (doesn't narrow it much, I know) and can you guess what the new puppet government did after the war ended? Yeah, it sold nearly all domestic companies, mines and factories for pennies to the western capitalists. It also dismantled a very efficient domestic financial/accounting system, replacing it with foreign banks. So, don't talk to me about how the West is somehow different, or better than China.
- NicoJuicy 5y ago
  Yet, you can still talk about it on an open forum on "a western platform" ( note: this isn't to take a side on good/wrong since i don't know what exactly you are talking about) But I'm pretty sure the problems in the country predate US intervention. And it doesn't contradict the fact that capitalism has made the world more peaceful than ever because of trade. Convince me with numbers otherwise. Ps. Yeah, i said WHO instead of IMF. Obviously, it's the latter.